So, these are LU64s, right? And somehow, they are "unsoftmoddable". To me, it just looks like they don't ship with any Trucha-capable IOSes and they do not have vulnerable boot1s. Are these the only differences? They seem perfectly softmoddable for most legitimate purposes. Sorry to ask, it's just that I have seen no clear information on these.http://forum.wiibrew.org/read.php?14,24768,24768#msg-24768Thu, 13 Aug 2026 14:39:43 +0200 Phorum 5.2.23 http://forum.wiibrew.org/read.php?14,24768,24772#msg-24772 http://forum.wiibrew.org/read.php?14,24768,24772#msg-24772 Arikado OfftopicMon, 13 Jul 2009 18:29:20 +0200 http://forum.wiibrew.org/read.php?14,24768,24771#msg-24771 http://forum.wiibrew.org/read.php?14,24768,24771#msg-24771
But basically, for legal purposes, you can do pretty much anything on these Wiis, besides install BootMii as boot2, but that is just recent Wiis in general, not specifically these "unsoftmoddable" ones, which are only LU64+ Wiis I believe.

EDIT: It appears the "fix" is a hacked bootmii sd card setup, and bootmii IOS. i will not discuss such things here of course, but it seems that with this, most "softmod" stuff is possible. by which i mean you can stuff your wii full of fail.]]> SifJar OfftopicMon, 13 Jul 2009 18:23:29 +0200 http://forum.wiibrew.org/read.php?14,24768,24768#msg-24768 http://forum.wiibrew.org/read.php?14,24768,24768#msg-24768
And somehow, they are "unsoftmoddable". To me, it just looks like they don't ship with any Trucha-capable IOSes and they do not have vulnerable boot1s.

Are these the only differences? They seem perfectly softmoddable for most legitimate purposes.

Sorry to ask, it's just that I have seen no clear information on these.]]> WikiFSX OfftopicMon, 13 Jul 2009 18:17:19 +0200