Ethical discussion about Backup Loaders and Emulators (not discussing using them) November 09, 2010 10:36PM | Registered: 15 years ago Posts: 28 |
Re: Ethical discussion about Backup Loaders and Emulators (not discussing using them) November 09, 2010 10:41PM | Admin Registered: 16 years ago Posts: 3,247 |
Re: Ethical discussion about Backup Loaders and Emulators (not discussing using them) November 09, 2010 11:38PM | Registered: 15 years ago Posts: 28 |
Re: Ethical discussion about Backup Loaders and Emulators (not discussing using them) November 10, 2010 01:00AM | Registered: 15 years ago Posts: 1,114 |
Quote
bg4545
There's also another point; Homebrew ROMs [for classic consoles]. You can't load homebre with a backup loader and if you have a loader you already have homebrew.
Quote
lorddunlow
I just don't understand why discussion of emulators (for which playing pirated games is the most common use) is allowed. It just seem hypocritical, and it is definitely a case of differential ethics (although your above points do offer some very weak reasons for one being discussed and not the other - homebrew games, although that is not the main reason for using an emulator).
Quote
lorddunlow
There are legitimate uses of backup loaders that do not include piracy (if you don't consider playing ROMs on an emulator piracy). It is nice to have your entire library of games available with sorting/search capabilities without having to get up from the couch and hunt through some cases of games for the one you want.
Quote
lorddunlow
I understand not providing technical support, but this strict "pretend it doesn't exist and blast anyone who utters the words ROMs, backup loaders, and (now) cIOS" needs to stop for this to return to the helpful forum it used to be.
Quote
lorddunlow
Open software projects need open discussion forums. I understand having to cover yourselves legally by not providing support for some questionably legal uses (although many would argue homebrew in general is questionably legal), but no one will come down on you for merely discussing them.
Re: Ethical discussion about Backup Loaders and Emulators (not discussing using them) November 10, 2010 01:30AM | Admin Registered: 16 years ago Posts: 3,247 |
Re: Ethical discussion about Backup Loaders and Emulators (not discussing using them) November 10, 2010 02:24AM | Admin Registered: 16 years ago Posts: 5,132 |
Re: Ethical discussion about Backup Loaders and Emulators (not discussing using them) November 10, 2010 02:37AM | Registered: 15 years ago Posts: 552 |
Quote
Arikado
It may not be the best set of rules; But they are rules.
Re: Ethical discussion about Backup Loaders and Emulators (not discussing using them) November 10, 2010 02:41PM | Registered: 15 years ago Posts: 28 |
Re: Ethical discussion about Backup Loaders and Emulators (not discussing using them) November 11, 2010 04:10PM | Admin Registered: 16 years ago Posts: 5,132 |
Re: Ethical discussion about Backup Loaders and Emulators (not discussing using them) November 11, 2010 06:04PM | Registered: 15 years ago Posts: 28 |
Re: Ethical discussion about Backup Loaders and Emulators (not discussing using them) November 12, 2010 10:07PM | Registered: 15 years ago Posts: 1,114 |
Re: Ethical discussion about Backup Loaders and Emulators (not discussing using them) November 12, 2010 11:10PM | Moderator Registered: 15 years ago Posts: 5,075 |
Quote
jbc007
After all, most people do not have the capability to dump their own roms (except for the disc based ones that can be dumped with any computer).
Re: Ethical discussion about Backup Loaders and Emulators (not discussing using them) November 13, 2010 06:07AM | Registered: 15 years ago Posts: 28 |
Quote
jbc007
We don't need to tell people where to download roms, but as long as we support emulators, we should not take issue with someone for illegally downloading a rom.
Re: Ethical discussion about Backup Loaders and Emulators (not discussing using them) November 13, 2010 09:16AM | Registered: 15 years ago Posts: 1,114 |
Quote
lorddunlow
This forum has a tendency to crucify someone and end any useful discussion if someone just happens to mention a backup loader, or something else that may be piracy, even if it has no bearing (or at least very little) on the person's question. In some cases, asking help to fix a problem caused by loaders, etc. Gets the cold shoulder, if not outright attacked. I understand the reason behind the forum's strict anti-piracy stance, but I think a little leniency is needed in some cases.
Quote
lorddunlow
Also, if you want to have a strict anti-piracy stance with no exceptions, then discussion of emulators also needs to be blacklisted as well.
Quote
lorddunlow
Again, I'm not trying to step on any toes here, I just don't understand the logic of some of ways things are handled here.
Re: Ethical discussion about Backup Loaders and Emulators (not discussing using them) November 13, 2010 08:47PM | Admin Registered: 16 years ago Posts: 3,247 |
Yeah, that's pretty much it. Also, if a user blatantly admits to pirating games, they'd probbably get 'attacked'. If a user just happens to mention having a backup loader we will tell them not to discuss it here and depending on how/what they asked, they do get help with their problems.Quote
jbc007According to the rules, by using piracy related applications such as backup loaders, a user is automatically disqualified from receiving any sort of support on this forum. In practice, we rarely, if ever, take such an extreme stance; instead, we usually assist people who have difficulty with their epic fail homebrew, provided that they wish to remove it. All the same, it would be greatly preferable if people did not come here to talk about their backup loaders, no matter the reason.Quote
lorddunlow
This forum has a tendency to crucify someone and end any useful discussion if someone just happens to mention a backup loader, or something else that may be piracy, even if it has no bearing (or at least very little) on the person's question. In some cases, asking help to fix a problem caused by loaders, etc. Gets the cold shoulder, if not outright attacked. I understand the reason behind the forum's strict anti-piracy stance, but I think a little leniency is needed in some cases.